Not only did the application propose 6 new houses, comprising 4 four-bedroomed houses over 3 floors, 1 three bed dorma-bungalow and 1 two bed dorma-bungalow, it also called for a considerable stretch of Heyes Lane to be moved to create a larger junction to access the site, resulting in the loss of the majority the green verges in that area. The only remaining grass verge would be the one outside of the Emmerson offices.
The Parish Council, represented by Cllr Myles Garbett and residents, represented by Sarah Greenwood, argued that there was overwhelming objection to the development due to:
- the development impacting negatively on the amenity of neighbours, particularly Oakfield Close which is at a much lower level resulting in a loss of privacy and light and 81 Heyes Lane where Plot 6 would be built right on its party line;
- inadequate parking provision on site (contrary to Cheshire East Council Parking Standards)
- removal of almost all the grass verges in the area to accommodate access, which are not only protected in the emerging Neighbourhood Plan, but also form part of the green infrastructure in the area
- moving the highway to create a false bend, along a stretch of road dated back to the 1800’s with a historical straight road, block terrace house build character;
- reducing pavement width and the separation between pedestrians and motorists which is at odds with the government active travel policy;
- unsuitability of the unadopted access road, known as Buck Horn Street, for the shared use by additional cars, pedestrians and cyclists;
- concern that a mature A1 graded oak tree, at the entrance of Buckhorn St, would come under threat from this work;
- the planned houses would suffer from a lack of amenity space and inadequate provision was made for refuse storage
They argued that despite moving the highway, destroying the
verges and changing the historic character of the road, visibility at the
entrance will not be improved as there is on road parking on that side of the
carriageway all day. The parked cars will simply move with the new road and the
only way to prevent this would be to double yellow line Heyes Lane, therefore
exacerbating an already severe on street parking problem.
Cllr Browne commented, “Following a two-hour discussion by
members, the application was proposed for refusal with four votes in favour,
four against and four abstentions, which meant that the decision came down to a
casting vote. As Chair, the casting vote is not something that I use lightly;
however, on this occasion I felt that on balance the application should be
refused. I also had concerns that the council’s parking policies, which for
four-bedroom dwellings require three spaces to be provided within the curtilage
of the site, were not being adhered to.
